Merlin Warns UK's AI Training Law Could Cause $200M Annual Damage to Independent Artists
Merlin, representing independent music companies, has strongly opposed the UK's proposed AI training law that would allow AI developers to train models on copyrighted works without permission. The organization warns this could cause over $200 million in annual damages to independent artists.
"Independent music is not raw material for tech companies to exploit without consent," states Merlin CEO Jeremy Sirota. "AI should be additive, not a tool for devaluing human artistry."
Photo Credit: Merlin Network
Key concerns raised by Merlin:
- AI developers could use protected works without permission or compensation
- Rightsholders would bear the burden of opting out
- The law primarily benefits AI companies at the expense of creators
Merlin's recommended alternatives:
- Require AI developers to obtain permission before training
- Mandate disclosure of materials already used in AI models
- Maintain existing copyright protections
Industry support against the proposal includes:
- Major record labels
- Association of Independent Music (AIM)
- Independent Music Publishers' E-Licensing (IMPEL)
- Independent Music Publishers International Forum (IMPF)
IMPF President Annette Barrett calls the proposal "an existential threat to IP in the UK," while IMPEL CEO Sarah Williams urges the government to support initiatives that enable responsible AI licensing while protecting creators.
The UK government is reportedly considering revising its approach following widespread opposition through the Make It Fair campaign, which has united creators and industry stakeholders in protecting artistic rights.
Related Articles
What Record Label Does Snoop Dogg Own? Everything About Death Row Records
